On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 00:42 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > Whether or not this is the right thing to do remains to be seen, > but it does allow us to verify whether or not the wake_affine > strategy of always doing affine wakeups and only disabling them > in a specific circumstance is sound, or needs rethinking...
Yes, it needs rethinking. I know why you want to try this, yes, select_idle_sibling() is very much a two faced little bitch. NOHZ doesn't help, my kernels throttle it. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
