On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:35:26 -0700
Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> > The easy way would be by calling div64_s64 and div64_u64,
> > which are 64 bit all the way through.
> > 
> > Any objections?
> 
> Sounds good to me.
> 
> > The inlined bits seem to be stubs calling the _rem variants
> > of the functions, and discarding the remainder.
> 
> I was referring to pos_ratio_polynom().  The compiler will probably be
> uninlining it anyway, but still...

I believe this should do the trick.

---8<---

Subject: mm,writeback: fix divide by zero in pos_ratio_polynom

It is possible for "limit - setpoint + 1" to equal zero, leading to a
divide by zero error. Blindly adding 1 to "limit - setpoint" is not
working, so we need to actually test the divisor before calling div64.

Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <r...@redhat.com>
---
 mm/page-writeback.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index ef41349..37f56bb 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -593,15 +593,20 @@ unsigned long bdi_dirty_limit(struct backing_dev_info 
*bdi, unsigned long dirty)
  * (5) the closer to setpoint, the smaller |df/dx| (and the reverse)
  *     => fast response on large errors; small oscillation near setpoint
  */
-static inline long long pos_ratio_polynom(unsigned long setpoint,
+static long long pos_ratio_polynom(unsigned long setpoint,
                                          unsigned long dirty,
                                          unsigned long limit)
 {
+       unsigned long divisor;
        long long pos_ratio;
        long x;
 
-       x = div_s64(((s64)setpoint - (s64)dirty) << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT,
-                   limit - setpoint + 1);
+       divisor = limit - setpoint;
+       if (!divisor)
+               divisor = 1;    /* Avoid div-by-zero */
+
+       x = div64_s64(((s64)setpoint - (s64)dirty) << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT,
+                   divisor);
        pos_ratio = x;
        pos_ratio = pos_ratio * x >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT;
        pos_ratio = pos_ratio * x >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT;
@@ -842,8 +847,12 @@ static unsigned long bdi_position_ratio(struct 
backing_dev_info *bdi,
        x_intercept = bdi_setpoint + span;
 
        if (bdi_dirty < x_intercept - span / 4) {
-               pos_ratio = div_u64(pos_ratio * (x_intercept - bdi_dirty),
-                                   x_intercept - bdi_setpoint + 1);
+               unsigned long divisor = x_intercept - bdi_setpoint;
+               if (!divisor)
+                       divisor = 1;    /* Avoid div-by-zero */
+
+               pos_ratio = div64_u64(pos_ratio * (x_intercept - bdi_dirty),
+                                   divisor);
        } else
                pos_ratio /= 4;
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to