On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote:
>> >> We really shouldn't be doing new architecture specific procfs files >> >> any more. I suggest you drop this one for now, and add back the >> >> functionality using perf or ftrace at a later point. >> > >> > Okay, will remove this. >> >> MIPS and powerpc handle this through debugfs, cfr. >> arch/mips/kernel/unaligned.c and arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c. > > Ah, right, that would work too. Being able to use perf from user > space sounds more flexible though. It's certainly something that > can be decided later. Yes, we can add this back through debugfs or perf in later. Regards Ley Foon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
