The current STMPE I2C probing code does not really match the
compatible strings - it matches node names happening to give
the right device name. Instead, let's introduce some real
compatible matching, more complex, more accurate.

Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/mfd/stmpe-i2c.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/stmpe-i2c.c b/drivers/mfd/stmpe-i2c.c
index 0da02e11d58e..8902a600d978 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/stmpe-i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/stmpe-i2c.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
 #include "stmpe.h"
 
 static int i2c_reg_read(struct stmpe *stmpe, u8 reg)
@@ -52,15 +53,71 @@ static struct stmpe_client_info i2c_ci = {
        .write_block = i2c_block_write,
 };
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+static const struct of_device_id stmpe_of_match[] = {
+       {
+               .compatible = "st,stmpe610",
+               .data = (void *)STMPE610,
+       },
+       {
+               .compatible = "st,stmpe801",
+               .data = (void *)STMPE801,
+       },
+       {
+               .compatible = "st,stmpe811",
+               .data = (void *)STMPE811,
+       },
+       {
+               .compatible = "st,stmpe1601",
+               .data = (void *)STMPE1601,
+       },
+       {
+               .compatible = "st,stmpe1801",
+               .data = (void *)STMPE1801,
+       },
+       {
+               .compatible = "st,stmpe2401",
+               .data = (void *)STMPE2401,
+       },
+       {
+               .compatible = "st,stmpe2403",
+               .data = (void *)STMPE2403,
+       },
+       {},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stmpe_of_match);
+
+int stmpe_i2c_of_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c)
+{
+       const struct of_device_id *of_id;
+
+       of_id = of_match_device(stmpe_of_match, &i2c->dev);
+       if (!of_id)
+               return -EINVAL;
+       return (int)of_id->data;
+}
+#else
+int stmpe_i2c_of_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c)
+{
+       return -EINVAL;
+}
+#endif
+
 static int
 stmpe_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
 {
+       int partnum;
+
        i2c_ci.data = (void *)id;
        i2c_ci.irq = i2c->irq;
        i2c_ci.client = i2c;
        i2c_ci.dev = &i2c->dev;
 
-       return stmpe_probe(&i2c_ci, id->driver_data);
+       partnum = stmpe_i2c_of_probe(i2c);
+       if (partnum < 0)
+               partnum = id->driver_data;
+
+       return stmpe_probe(&i2c_ci, partnum);
 }
 
 static int stmpe_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *i2c)
@@ -89,6 +146,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver stmpe_i2c_driver = {
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM
                .pm = &stmpe_dev_pm_ops,
 #endif
+               .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(stmpe_of_match),
        },
        .probe          = stmpe_i2c_probe,
        .remove         = stmpe_i2c_remove,
-- 
1.9.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to