On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:45:41AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 08:11:37AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: > > > I sent the patch for it which solve this problem in generic way. > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/8/42 > > > Feel free to give me ACK for it. > > Will has been working on this too off and on, he was also trying to > define some semantics for the relaxed versions. It'd be really good to > address this properly, this is a constant source of make work.
Yes, I have a series adding relaxed accessors to all architectures (and asm-generic) along with an attempt at defining some semantics. This came about from discussion with BenH at the last kernel summit, I just didn't get around to posting what we came up with. I should be able to post something this week, but there's still an open question relating to mmiowb() that I'd like the PPC guys to chime in on. Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
