Hi Richard,
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 19:28:44 +0200, Richard Leitner wrote:
> Fixed most checkpatch.pl issues
Thanks for doing this. Overall it looks good, there are just two
warnings I would like fixed slightly differently:
> @@ -268,13 +272,14 @@ static s32 ali1563_access(struct i2c_adapter * a, u16
> addr,
> }
>
> outb_p(((addr & 0x7f) << 1) | (rw & 0x01), SMB_HST_ADD);
> - outb_p((inb_p(SMB_HST_CNTL2) & ~HST_CNTL2_SIZEMASK) | (size << 3),
> SMB_HST_CNTL2);
> + outb_p((inb_p(SMB_HST_CNTL2) & ~HST_CNTL2_SIZEMASK) |
> + (size << 3), SMB_HST_CNTL2);
Please align on the opening parenthesis.
> @@ -392,14 +398,15 @@ static struct i2c_adapter ali1563_adapter = {
> static int ali1563_probe(struct pci_dev *dev,
> const struct pci_device_id *id_table)
> {
> - int error;
> + int error = ali1563_setup(dev);
>
> - if ((error = ali1563_setup(dev)))
> + if (error)
> goto exit;
Please leave the variable declaration alone, so that the error check
can immediately follow the assignment, as was the case before. Anyway
it is not recommended to run "real code" during variable declaration.
With these changes applied, feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelv...@suse.de>
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
