On 04/10/2014 03:07 PM, Antoine Ténart wrote:

Missing commit message.

Signed-off-by: Antoine Ténart <antoine.ten...@free-electrons.com>
---
  .../bindings/pinctrl/marvell,berlin-pinctrl.txt    | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/marvell,berlin-pinctrl.txt

diff --git 
a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/marvell,berlin-pinctrl.txt 
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/marvell,berlin-pinctrl.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e21538a37734
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/marvell,berlin-pinctrl.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+* Pinctrl driver for the Marvell Berlin SoCs
+
+The pins controlled by the Marvell Berlin controller are organized in groups.
+Configuration is done by group, so no actual pin information is needed.
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible:  "marvell-berlin2cd-pinctrl",
+               "marvell-berlin2-pinctrl",
+               "marvell-berlin2q-pinctrl"

s/marvell-/marvell,/g

Also, you can add at least some prosa like
"compatible: should be one of"...

+- reg: registers physical addresses and lengths of the pin controller.
+- reg-names: name of the register regions.
+
+Please refer to pinctrl-bindings.txt in this directory for details of the
+common pinctrl bindings used by client devices.
+
+A pinctrl should contains subnodes representing the pinctrl pin group

s/pinctrl/pin-controller/g
s/contains/contain

+configurations, one per group. Each subnode has the group name and the muxing
+function used.
+
+Required subnode-properties:
+- berlin,group: a string describing the group's name.
+- berlin,function: the function used to mux the group.
+       0: function 0
+       1: function 1
+       ...

s/berlin,/marvell,/

And I also prefer either DT binding includes for each function (even if
the proper name is not known).

+
+Example:
+
+pinctrl: pinctrl@0 {

I looked at ePAPR recommended node names yesterday. It uses
foo-controller for all listed examples. Also, with the idea
of splitting both pin-controllers into separate nodes the
above (with broken unit-address) will become:

soc_pinctrl: pin-controller@ea0000 {
        compatible = "marvell,berlin2q-soc-pinctrl";
        reg = <0xea0000 0x08>;
};

and

sm_pinctrl: pin-controller@fc0000 {
        compatible = "marvell,berlin2q-sysmgr-pinctrl";
        reg = <0xfc0000 0x44>;
};

Sebastian

+       compatible = "marvell,berlin2q-pinctrl";
+       reg = <0xea0000 0x08>, <0xfc0000 0x44>;
+       reg-names = "global_base", "sm_base";
+
+       uart0_pmux: uart0-pmux {
+               berlin,group = "GSM12";
+               berlin,function = <0>;
+       };
+}
+
+&uart0 {
+       pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_pmux>;
+       pinctrl-names = "default";
+};


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to