On Thu, February 17, 2005 1:22 am, d.c said: > Do like them, ignore BK and continue using patch & diff. BK is just a > option, It doesn't stops you from developing in the linux kernel, I > can't understand why people cares so much about BK.
The affects of many top level folks using a non free system is felt all the way down the food-chain. If the top tier would agree to use a free SCM system then we could build bridges and offer the data in the preferred format to _everyone_ (arch, subversion, patch, BK, etc). But because BK is used at the top, many useful options are cut off. It's a rather large "hidden" cost of BK adoption as the primary tool at the top. Cheers, Sean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
