On Fri, February 18, 2005 11:27 am, Theodore Ts'o said: > If you truly believe that BK would be able to add the value that it > does to the kernel development process by using some other SCM as the > master SCM, with BK being "underneath", as you proposed earlier, then > you do not understand why BK is fundamentally better than the current > open source SCM systems that are out there.
BK already feeds patches out at the head, surely if it's as powerful as you think, it could feed a free SCM too for your non-bk friends in the community. > And people *can* use the tools of their choice today. They can use > CVS, and diff+patch, and suffer with all of the limitations that those > tools have today. And for people who are doing stuff around the > periphery, quilt is often really the best tool for them. The situation could be improved for these other tools if there wasn't so much BK zealotry from those that use it. > If it's about the whole ***kernel*** development community, then it's > pretty clear that the current system works quite well. All of the > complaints have been coming primarily from SCM hackers, it seems, and > not people who truly need the power of more powerful than downloading > the bk snapshots, using the CVS export tree, and in the case where > they need to look at the changes in a single changeset bkbits.net. There's no technical reason for this limitation. > The "cost" of using BK seems to be primarily more theoretical, and > ideological, than real. It's always seems to be about someone > kvetching that they want to use SVN and get finely grained changsets > through SVN, and they can't. But how often does that happen, and > what's so painful of getting the finely grained changeset through > bkbits.net? Not very. So at the end of the day, it finally boils > down to being all about ideology, doesn't it? No. It's just that the cost isn't being paid by you, so you don't care. Cheers, Sean. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/