On 31 March 2014 19:08, Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote: > And those cleanups make the compiler generate worse code at least on > x86_64: > > text data bss dec hex filename > 7475 554 0 8029 1f5d kernel/hrtimer.o > 7706 554 0 8260 2044 kernel/hrtimer.o > > So just removing parameters and return values because you can get the > same information from a datastructure is not necessarily a good thing.
Hmm.. Nice. Okay, I will have another look at patches and do this kind of investigation before sending it next time :) Its been fun going through these frameworks. How do you want to proceed now? I mean, you will take the other patches (which don't play with function parameters) as is or want me to send a single unified patchset with all the pending patches that I have? Thanks for your support :) -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
