Hi Richard, On Mar 19, Richard Weinberger wrote: > The ->get() function is not optional. >
[..] > static struct kernel_param_ops ubiblock_param_ops = { > .set = ubiblock_set_param, > + .get = param_get_charp, > }; > module_param_cb(block, &ubiblock_param_ops, NULL, 0); The comment for the function says they are both optional: /** * module_param_cb - general callback for a module/cmdline parameter * @name: a valid C identifier which is the parameter name. * @ops: the set & get operations for this parameter. * @perm: visibility in sysfs. * * The ops can have NULL set or get functions. */ This has no visibility in sysfs, so I can't see how having a NULL get() is a problem. What's the issue you're trying to fix here? Maybe I'm missing something? -- Ezequiel GarcĂa, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/