Comment about interesting interlocking between lockbuf_lock and
console_sem is outdated. It was added in 2002 by commit
a880f45a48be2956d2c78a839c472287d54435c1 during conversion of
console_lock to console_sem + lockbuf_lock. At that time
release_console_sem() (today's equivalent is console_unlock()) was
indeed using lockbuf_lock to avoid races between trylock on console_sem
in printk() and unlock of console_sem. However these days the
interlocking is gone and the races are avoided by rechecking logbuf
state after releasing console_sem.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
---
kernel/printk/printk.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index 4dae9cbe9259..bd7ee2a9f960 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -206,8 +206,7 @@ struct printk_log {
};
/*
- * The logbuf_lock protects kmsg buffer, indices, counters. It is also
- * used in interesting ways to provide interlocking in console_unlock();
+ * The logbuf_lock protects kmsg buffer, indices, counters.
*/
static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(logbuf_lock);
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
