On Mar 12, 2014, at 1:07 PM, Jason Gunthorpe <jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 05:46:53PM +0100, Boris BREZILLON wrote: >> I'm not a big fan of this name. I think timing structs should not >> contain onfi in their names, because these timings are also >> available on non ONFI chips. > > Explicitly defering to the ONFI spec makes it clear what the > definition of the timing parameter actually is. This is good, since ONFI is a very public spec. > If JEDEC has a different model then drivers will need to configure > their interfaces a little differently. JEDEC’s spec is just a public as ONFI’s, but in the past at least it has been difficult to get without purchase. > So we might end up with a jedec_sdr_timings too :| And onfi_ddr_timings and jedec_ddr_timings since those timing modes are appearing on shipping parts. Warner -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
