On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Dongsheng Yang <[email protected]> wrote: > Commit 411cf180f introduce function uncore_cpumask_init() and it is only > called in __init intel_uncore_init(). But it is not marked with __init, > then the following warning is there when building. > I did not get this warning when building my kernels. But I agree with the patch.
Acked-by: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]> > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x2464a): Section mismatch in reference from the > function uncore_cpumask_init() to the function .init.text:uncore_cpu_setup() > The function uncore_cpumask_init() references > the function __init uncore_cpu_setup(). > This is often because uncore_cpumask_init lacks a __init > annotation or the annotation of uncore_cpu_setup is wrong. > > This patch add __init for uncore_cpumask_init() function. > > Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <[email protected]> > cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> > cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]> > cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> > cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> > cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> > cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]> > cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c > b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c > index b262c61..5c2537a 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c > @@ -4229,7 +4229,7 @@ static int __init uncore_pmus_register(void) > return 0; > } > > -static void uncore_cpumask_init(void) > +static void __init uncore_cpumask_init(void) > { > int cpu; > > -- > 1.8.2.1 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
