Commit 411cf180f introduce function uncore_cpumask_init() and it is only
called in __init intel_uncore_init(). But it is not marked with __init,
then the following warning is there when building.

WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x2464a): Section mismatch in reference from the 
function uncore_cpumask_init() to the function .init.text:uncore_cpu_setup()
The function uncore_cpumask_init() references
the function __init uncore_cpu_setup().
This is often because uncore_cpumask_init lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of uncore_cpu_setup is wrong.

This patch add __init for uncore_cpumask_init() function.

Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <[email protected]>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c 
b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
index b262c61..5c2537a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
@@ -4229,7 +4229,7 @@ static int __init uncore_pmus_register(void)
        return 0;
 }
 
-static void uncore_cpumask_init(void)
+static void __init uncore_cpumask_init(void)
 {
        int cpu;
 
-- 
1.8.2.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to