On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 12:58:07 -0800 Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:24:45 +1100 NeilBrown <ne...@suse.de> wrote: > > > If poll or select is waiting on /proc/mdstat when md-mod is unloaded > > an oops will ensure when the poll/select completes. > > > > This is because the wait_queue_head which is registered with poll_wait() > > is local to the module and no longer exists when the poll completes and > > detaches that wait_queue_head (in poll_free_wait -> remove_wait_queue). > > > > To fix this we need the wait_queue_head to have (at least) the same life > > time as the proc_dir_entry. So this patch places it in that structure. > > > > We: > > - add pde_poll_wait to struct proc_dir_entry > > - call poll_wait() passing this when poll() is called on the proc file > > - export a function proc_wake_up which will call wake_up() on > > pde_poll_wait > > > > and make use of all that in md.c > > This sounds wrong. If a userspace process is waiting on > md_event_waiters then the md module is "busy" and the rmmod attempt > should fail? Al Viro says "no" quite firmly. I think the core argument is that rmmod md-mod < /proc/mdstat would deadlock. http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=133024267507384 Thanks, NeilBrown
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
