El lun, 31-01-2005 a las 14:42 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: > On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:50:25 +0100, Adrian Bunk said: > > On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 04:15:43AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Note that obsd_rand.c started off life as a BSD-licensed file - I was told > > > that was a show-stopper when I submitted basically the same patch a while > > > back. > > >... > > > > At least the three clause BSD license is GPL compatible. > > The copy of obsd_rand.c I have hass the problematic 4-clause version. It > looks > to me like we'd need to get Michael Shalayeff, Theodore T'so, and Niels Provos > to all agree to re-license under the 3-clause variant. Using Arjan's code is > most likely the better approach...
Then we would in that way ;) Arjan, I will give it a further look, is there anything you want to comment about it before I start? I will re-code it to put the helper functions in random.c. Thanks in advance, Cheers. -- Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [1024D/6F2B2DEC] & [2048g/9AE91A22][http://tuxedo-es.org]
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
