* Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At least the three clause BSD license is GPL compatible. > > Yes, AFAIK :) > > I will try to follow Arjan's recommendations on using his functions > instead of obsd ones, even if I think it should be alone in the > current file. Also I will split up the patch.
could you please also react to this feedback: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=110698371131630&w=2 to quote a couple of key points from that very detailed security analysis: " I'm not sure how the OpenBSD code is better in any way. (Notice that it uses the same "half_md4_transform" as Linux; you just added another copy.) Is there a design note on how the design was chosen? " that mail also includes a much smaller patch to random.c. ( Obviously the more fundamental questions have to be solved prior solving code-level problems, patch splitup and patch ordering - often one ends up having a much smaller patch to work with, by thinking more about the fundamentals. ) Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
