Quoting Jean-Jacques Hiblot (2014-02-05 00:37:36) > From: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezil...@overkiz.com> > > System clks are just gates, and thus do not provide any rate operations. > Authorize clk rate change to be propagated to system clk parents. > > Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezil...@overkiz.com> > --- > drivers/clk/at91/clk-system.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-system.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-system.c > index 8f7c043..a98557b 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-system.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-system.c > @@ -84,7 +84,8 @@ at91_clk_register_system(struct at91_pmc *pmc, const char > *name, > * (see drivers/memory) which would request and enable the ddrck > clock. > * When this is done we will be able to remove CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag. > */ > - init.flags = CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED; > + init.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_GATE | CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT |
Just wanted to do a quick sanity check here. Do you really need CLK_SET_RATE_GATE? Otherwise these patches look fine. Regards, Mike > + CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED; > > sys->id = id; > sys->hw.init = &init; > -- > 1.8.5.2 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
