On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 19:50:39 +0900 (JST) YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [EMAIL PROTECTED](B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:46:43 +1100), Herbert > Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: > > > If we wanted to preserve the split device semantics, then we > > can create a local GC list in IPv6 so that it can search based > > on rt6i_idev as well as the other keys. Alternatively we can > > remove the dst->dev == dev check in dst_dev_event and dst_ifdown > > and move that test down to the individual ifdown functions. > > Yes, IPv6 needs "split device" semantics > (for per-device statistics such as Ip6InDelivers etc), > and I like later solution. Ok. I never read whether ipv6, like ipv4, is specified to support a model of host based ownership of addresses. Does anyone know? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
