In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sun, 06 Feb 2005 14:31:07 +0900 (JST)),
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [EMAIL PROTECTED](B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> The source of problem is entry (*) which still on routing entry,
> not on gc list. And, the owner of entry is not routing table but
> unicast/anycast address structure(s).
> We need to "kill" active address on the other interfaces.
Which means in addrconf_notiry(), if the dev == &loopback_dev,
call addrconf_ifdown for every device like this:
Signed-off-by: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
===== net/ipv6/addrconf.c 1.129 vs edited =====
--- 1.129/net/ipv6/addrconf.c 2005-01-18 06:13:31 +09:00
+++ edited/net/ipv6/addrconf.c 2005-02-06 14:48:25 +09:00
@@ -1961,6 +1961,20 @@
case NETDEV_DOWN:
case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
/*
+ * If lo is doing down we need to kill
+ * all addresses on the host because it owns
+ * route on lo. --yoshfuji
+ */
+ if (dev == &loopback_dev) {
+ struct net_device *dev1;
+ for (dev1 = dev_base; dev1; dev1 = dev->next) {
+ if (dev1 == &loopback_dev ||
+ __in6_dev_get(dev1) == NULL)
+ continue;
+ addrconf_ifdown(dev1, event != NETDEV_DOWN);
+ }
+ }
+ /*
* Remove all addresses from this interface.
*/
addrconf_ifdown(dev, event != NETDEV_DOWN);
--
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
