On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 04:16:44PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> 
> Nit: I find the conditionals here a little complicated.
> 
> Would something like this be clearer? (Untested):
> 
>       if (inode1 > inode2)
>               swap(inode1, inode2);
> 
>       if (inode1 && !S_ISDIR(inode1->i_mode))
>               mutex_lock(&inode1->i_mutex);
> 
>       if (inode2 && !S_ISDIR(inode2->i_mode) && inode2 != inode1)
>               mutex_lock_nested(&inode2->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_NONDIR2);

Yes, much better.  And it becomes nicely symmetric with the unlock function.

Thanks,
Miklos


> 
> --b.
> 
> diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
> index 4bcdad3..94e41c8 100644
> --- a/fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/inode.c
> @@ -944,24 +944,23 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(unlock_new_inode);
>  
>  /**
>   * lock_two_nondirectories - take two i_mutexes on non-directory objects
> + *
> + * Lock any non-NULL argument that is not a directory.
> + * Zero, one or two objects may be locked by this function.
> + *
>   * @inode1: first inode to lock
>   * @inode2: second inode to lock
>   */
>  void lock_two_nondirectories(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2)
>  {
> -     WARN_ON_ONCE(S_ISDIR(inode1->i_mode));
> -     if (inode1 == inode2 || !inode2) {
> -             mutex_lock(&inode1->i_mutex);
> -             return;
> -     }
> -     WARN_ON_ONCE(S_ISDIR(inode2->i_mode));
> -     if (inode1 < inode2) {
> +     if (inode1 > inode2)
> +             swap(inode1, inode2);
> +
> +     if (inode1 && !S_ISDIR(inode1->i_mode))
>               mutex_lock(&inode1->i_mutex);
> +
> +     if (inode2 && !S_ISDIR(inode2->i_mode) && inode2 != inode1)
>               mutex_lock_nested(&inode2->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_NONDIR2);
> -     } else {
> -             mutex_lock(&inode2->i_mutex);
> -             mutex_lock_nested(&inode1->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_NONDIR2);
> -     }
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(lock_two_nondirectories);
>  
> @@ -972,8 +971,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(lock_two_nondirectories);
>   */
>  void unlock_two_nondirectories(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2)
>  {
> -     mutex_unlock(&inode1->i_mutex);
> -     if (inode2 && inode2 != inode1)
> +     if (inode1 && !S_ISDIR(inode1->i_mode))
> +             mutex_unlock(&inode1->i_mutex);
> +     if (inode2 && !S_ISDIR(inode2->i_mode) && inode2 != inode1)
>               mutex_unlock(&inode2->i_mutex);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(unlock_two_nondirectories);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to