On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Fengguang Wu wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 02:13:59AM -0800, David Rientjes wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > > > [ 1.625020] BTRFS: selftest: Running btrfs_split_item tests > > > [ 1.627004] BTRFS: selftest: Running find delalloc tests > > > [ 2.289182] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 2299.967 MHz > > > [ 292.084537] kthreadd invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x3000d0, order=1, > > > oom_score_adj=0 > > > [ 292.086439] kthreadd cpuset= > > > [ 292.087072] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at > > > 0000000000000038 > > > [ 292.087372] IP: [<ffffffff812119de>] pr_cont_kernfs_name+0x1b/0x6c > > > > This looks like a problem with the cpuset cgroup name, are you sure this > > isn't related to the removal of cgroup->name? > > It looks not related to patch "cgroup: remove cgroup->name", because > that patch lies in the cgroup tree and not contained in output of "git log > BAD_COMMIT". >
It's dying on pr_cont_kernfs_name which is some tree that has "kernfs: implement kernfs_get_parent(), kernfs_name/path() and friends", which is not in linux-next, and is obviously printing the cpuset cgroup name. It doesn't look like it has anything at all to do with btrfs or why they would care about this failure. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
