On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This works, but is rather ugly.
Oh, please, that's a British-level understatement. It's like calling
WWII "a small bother".
That's too ugly to live.
> Looking for any other suggestions here.
Do we actually have to use "filename" at all?
We do have bprm->file, and we could get a path from that. It would be
more expensive, but for tracing execve that might be fine. Yes/no?
Or maybe we could just push the "putname(path)" into free_bprm() and
remove it from the callers. That's where we free bprm->interp anyway,
so it would kind of match.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
