Hi,
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pi...@linaro.org> wrote:
> The core idle loop now takes care of it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <n...@linaro.org>
> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> index 3fb8d95ab8..4505e2a950 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> @@ -298,10 +298,7 @@ void arch_cpu_idle_dead(void)
> */
> void arch_cpu_idle(void)
> {
> - if (cpuidle_idle_call())
> - x86_idle();
> - else
> - local_irq_enable();
> + x86_idle();
You're taking out the local_irq_enable() here but I don't see the
equivalent of adding it back in the 1/6 patch that moves the
cpuidle_idle_call() up to common code. It seems that one of the call
paths through cpuidle_idle_call() don't re-enable it on its own.
Even if this is the right thing to do, why it's OK to do so should
probably be documented in the patch description.
-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
