On 14-01-22 04:50 PM, David Cohen wrote: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 12:34:15PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote: >> Commit 85611e3febe78955a519f5f9eb47b941525c8c76 ("x86, intel-mid: >> Add Clovertrail platform support") added new instances of __cpuinit >> usage. We removed this a couple versions ago; we now want to remove >> the compat no-op stubs. Introducing new users is not what we want to >> see at this point in time, as it will break once the stubs are gone. >> >> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang...@intel.com> >> Cc: David Cohen <david.a.co...@linux.intel.com> >> Cc: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppusw...@linux.intel.com> >> Cc: Fei Yang <fei.y...@intel.com> >> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <h...@linux.intel.com> >> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com> >> --- >> >> [v2: actually include changes to mfld.c as well this time >> >> patch will be added to init cleanup series: >> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/paulg/init.git/ ] >> >> arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel_mid_weak_decls.h | 4 ++-- >> arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/mfld.c | 4 ++-- >> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel_mid_weak_decls.h >> b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel_mid_weak_decls.h >> index a537ffc16299..41fe17d0d8ff 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel_mid_weak_decls.h >> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel_mid_weak_decls.h >> @@ -14,6 +14,6 @@ >> /* For every CPU addition a new get_<cpuname>_ops interface needs >> * to be added. >> */ >> -extern void * __cpuinit get_penwell_ops(void) __attribute__((weak)); >> -extern void * __cpuinit get_cloverview_ops(void) __attribute__((weak)); >> +extern void *get_penwell_ops(void) __attribute__((weak)); >> +extern void *get_cloverview_ops(void) __attribute__((weak)); >> extern void * __init get_tangier_ops(void) __attribute__((weak)); >> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/mfld.c >> b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/mfld.c >> index 4f7884eebc14..88b06fcf9959 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/mfld.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/mfld.c >> @@ -64,12 +64,12 @@ static void __init penwell_arch_setup() >> pm_power_off = mfld_power_off; >> } >> >> -void * __cpuinit get_penwell_ops() >> +void *get_penwell_ops() >> { >> return &penwell_ops; >> } >> >> -void * __cpuinit get_cloverview_ops() >> +void *get_cloverview_ops() >> { >> return &penwell_ops; >> } > > You are still missing one: > > --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/mrfl.c > +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/mrfl.c > @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static struct intel_mid_ops tangier_ops = { > .arch_setup = tangier_arch_setup, > }; > > -void * __cpuinit get_tangier_ops() > +void * get_tangier_ops() > { > return &tangier_ops; > } > > Can you amend your patch?
That was fixed in the other patch you already ack'd :) http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/paulg/init.git/tree/x86-don-t-add-new-__cpuinit-users-to-Merrifield-plat.patch I made the tangier fix a separate patch since it had a separate introductory commit, and also actually had the section mismatch. Thanks, Paul. -- > > Br, David Cohen > >> -- >> 1.8.5.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/