On Fri, 17 Jan 2014, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> The name `max_pass' is misleading, because this variable actually keeps
> the estimate number of freeable objects, not the maximal number of
> objects we can scan in this pass, which can be twice that. Rename it to
> reflect its actual meaning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavy...@parallels.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgor...@suse.de>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.cz>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <han...@cmpxchg.org>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <r...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Dave Chinner <dchin...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Glauber Costa <glom...@gmail.com>
This doesn't compile on linux-next:
mm/vmscan.c: In function ‘shrink_slab_node’:
mm/vmscan.c:300:23: error: ‘max_pass’ undeclared (first use in this function)
mm/vmscan.c:300:23: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for
each function it appears in
because of b01fa2357bca ("mm: vmscan: shrink all slab objects if tight on
memory") from an author with a name remarkably similar to yours. Could
you rebase this series on top of your previous work that is already in
-mm?
