On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:48:37AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 10:47:07AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > This is my fuzz tester, but this looks to be part of normal operation,
> > not actually fuzzing a syscall. This looks to be the bit that
> > sets the task_comm name in the child process to 'trinity-cN'. Which
> > appears to have
> > succeeded judging by the Comm:, but the follow-on perf stuff seems to
> > be screwed up.
> >
> > WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 13500 at kernel/events/core.c:2379
> > task_ctx_sched_out+0x6b/0x80()
> > Modules linked in: 8021q garp stp snd_seq_dummy tun fuse rfcomm hidp sctp
> > bnep can_raw scsi_transport_iscsi nfc caif_socket caif af_802154 phonet
> > af_rxrpc bluetooth can_bcm can llc2 pppoe pppox ppp_generic slhc nfnetlink
> > irda ipt_ULOG crc_ccitt rds af_key rose x25 atm netrom appletalk ipx p8023
> > psnap p8022 llc ax25 cfg80211 rfkill coretemp hwmon x86_pkg_temp_thermal
> > kvm_intel kvm xfs snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel
> > snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep libcrc32c snd_seq e1000e snd_seq_device
> > crct10dif_pclmul crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel snd_pcm ptp
> > snd_page_alloc shpchp snd_timer snd microcode serio_raw soundcore
> > usb_debug pcspkr pps_core
> > CPU: 1 PID: 13500 Comm: trinity-c5 Not tainted 3.13.0-rc7+ #14
> > ffffffff81a240ac ffff88002e0c7df8 ffffffff816de2ee 0000000000000000
> > ffff88002e0c7e30 ffffffff81052ddd ffff88024d0975f8 ffff880214d7bb10
> > 0000000000000282 ffff88015b3b24c0 ffff880214d7bb10 ffff88002e0c7e40
> > Call Trace:
> > [<ffffffff816de2ee>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x7a
> > [<ffffffff81052ddd>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7d/0xa0
> > [<ffffffff81052eba>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
> > [<ffffffff81128d5b>] task_ctx_sched_out+0x6b/0x80
> > [<ffffffff8112ba78>] perf_event_comm+0x108/0x260
> > [<ffffffff8112b970>] ? perf_event_fork+0x20/0x20
> > [<ffffffff811a3815>] ? set_task_comm+0x25/0xc0
> > [<ffffffff811a383f>] set_task_comm+0x4f/0xc0
> > [<ffffffff8106b039>] SyS_prctl+0x229/0x3d0
> > [<ffffffff816f0b24>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2
> > ---[ end trace d6e98e080907af47 ]---
> >
> >
> > 2379 if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ctx != cpuctx->task_ctx))
> > 2380 return;
>
> Hmm, you wouldn't happen to have the perf_event_attr for all active
> events, would you?
dammit. forgot about this, and hit it again overnight.
Is there a handy function in the kernel to dump that struct
that I can call from that path ?
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
