Am Mon, 20 Jan 2014 22:16:33 -0800 (PST) schrieb David Rientjes <rient...@google.com>:
> Not sure why you don't just do a one line patch: > > - phys_addr_t size; > + phys_addr_t size __maybe_unused; > to fix it. Just because I did not know that __maybe_unused thing. Discussion of this fix seems to be obsolete because Andrew already took the patch int the form he suggested: One #ifdef in the function with a basic block declaring size once inside. Regards Philipp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
