On 1/9/2014 7:50 PM, Mark Salter wrote:
....
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
index 987a7f5..038fb75 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
#include <asm/cpu.h>
#include <asm/cputype.h>
#include <asm/elf.h>
+#include <asm/io.h>
#include <asm/procinfo.h>
#include <asm/psci.h>
#include <asm/sections.h>
@@ -887,6 +888,8 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
parse_early_param();
+ early_ioremap_init();
+
sort(&meminfo.bank, meminfo.nr_banks, sizeof(meminfo.bank[0]),
meminfo_cmp, NULL);
early_paging_init(mdesc, lookup_processor_type(read_cpuid_id()));
Any chance we could do this even earlier, say right after
setup_processor? It would be nice to be able to do this while FDT
scanning (I have a use case in mind, potential patches are in the works)
<snip>
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
index 580ef2d..bef59b9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
#include <asm/mach/arch.h>
#include <asm/mach/map.h>
#include <asm/mach/pci.h>
+#include <asm/early_ioremap.h>
#include "mm.h"
#include "tcm.h"
@@ -1405,6 +1406,7 @@ void __init paging_init(const struct machine_desc *mdesc)
{
void *zero_page;
+ early_ioremap_reset();
build_mem_type_table();
prepare_page_table();
map_lowmem();
Neither x86 nor arm64 get rid of existing mapping in paging_init. Is
there a reason this needs to be here for arm? Are there concerns about
alias mappings?
Thanks,
Laura
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
