On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:24:34 -0600 Nathan Zimmer <[email protected]> wrote:

> We don't need to do register_memory_resource() since it has its own lock and
> doesn't make any callbacks.
> 
> Also register_memory_resource return NULL on failure so we don't have anything
> to cleanup at this point.
> 
> 
> The reason for this rfc is I was doing some experiments with hotplugging of
> memory on some of our larger systems.  While it seems to work, it can be quite
> slow.  With some preliminary digging I found that lock_memory_hotplug is
> clearly ripe for breakup.
> 
> It could be broken up per nid or something but it also covers the
> online_page_callback.  The online_page_callback shouldn't be very hard to 
> break
> out.
> 
> Also there is the issue of various structures(wmarks come to mind) that are
> only updated under the lock_memory_hotplug that would need to be dealt with.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1097,17 +1097,18 @@ int __ref add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
>       struct resource *res;
>       int ret;
>  
> -     lock_memory_hotplug();
> -
>       res = register_memory_resource(start, size);
>       ret = -EEXIST;
>       if (!res)
> -             goto out;
> +             return ret;
>  
>       {       /* Stupid hack to suppress address-never-null warning */
>               void *p = NODE_DATA(nid);
>               new_pgdat = !p;
>       }
> +
> +     lock_memory_hotplug();
> +
>       new_node = !node_online(nid);
>       if (new_node) {
>               pgdat = hotadd_new_pgdat(nid, start);

Looks sane to me.

register_memory_resource() makes me cry.  Please review:


From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Subject: mm/memory_hotplug.c: register_memory_resource() fixes

- register_memory_resource() should not go BUG on ENOMEM.  That's
  appropriate at system boot time, but not at memory-hotplug time.  Fix.

- register_memory_resource()'s caller is incorrectly replacing
  request_resource()'s -EBUSY with -EEXIST.  Fix this by propagating
  errors appropriately.

Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
Cc: Hedi <[email protected]>
Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
Cc: Mike Travis <[email protected]>
Cc: Nathan Zimmer <[email protected]>
Cc: Tang Chen <[email protected]>
Cc: Wen Congyang <[email protected]>
Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
---

 mm/memory_hotplug.c |   15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff -puN mm/memory_hotplug.c~mm-memory_hotplugc-register_memory_resource-fixes 
mm/memory_hotplug.c
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c~mm-memory_hotplugc-register_memory_resource-fixes
+++ a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -64,17 +64,21 @@ void unlock_memory_hotplug(void)
 static struct resource *register_memory_resource(u64 start, u64 size)
 {
        struct resource *res;
+       int err;
+
        res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), GFP_KERNEL);
-       BUG_ON(!res);
+       if (!res)
+               return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
        res->name = "System RAM";
        res->start = start;
        res->end = start + size - 1;
        res->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
-       if (request_resource(&iomem_resource, res) < 0) {
+       err = request_resource(&iomem_resource, res);
+       if (err) {
                pr_debug("System RAM resource %pR cannot be added\n", res);
                kfree(res);
-               res = NULL;
+               res = ERR_PTR(err);
        }
        return res;
 }
@@ -1108,9 +1112,8 @@ int __ref add_memory(int nid, u64 start,
                return ret;
 
        res = register_memory_resource(start, size);
-       ret = -EEXIST;
-       if (!res)
-               return ret;
+       if (IS_ERR(res))
+               return PTR_ERR(res);
 
        {       /* Stupid hack to suppress address-never-null warning */
                void *p = NODE_DATA(nid);
_

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to