>>> On 13.01.14 at 14:00, Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 12:34 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 13.01.14 at 13:01, Olaf Hering <o...@aepfle.de> wrote: >> > On Mon, Jan 13, Jan Beulich wrote: >> > >> >> You can't do this in one go - the first two and the last one may be >> >> set independently (and are independent in their meaning), and >> >> hence need to be queried independently (xenbus_gather() fails >> >> on the first absent value). >> > >> > Yes, thats the purpose. Since the properties are required its an all or >> > nothing thing. If they are truly optional then blkif.h should be updated >> > to say that. >> >> They _are_ optional. > > But is it true that either they are all present or they are all absent?
No, it's not. discard-secure is independent of the other two (but those other two are tied together). Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
