On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 12:34 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 13.01.14 at 13:01, Olaf Hering <o...@aepfle.de> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 13, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > >> You can't do this in one go - the first two and the last one may be > >> set independently (and are independent in their meaning), and > >> hence need to be queried independently (xenbus_gather() fails > >> on the first absent value). > > > > Yes, thats the purpose. Since the properties are required its an all or > > nothing thing. If they are truly optional then blkif.h should be updated > > to say that. > > They _are_ optional.
But is it true that either they are all present or they are all absent? Ian. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
