Hi Ben,

Thank you for the patch.

On Saturday 11 January 2014 13:05:38 Ben Dooks wrote:
> The drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c file is causing warnings from
> the clock driver (as shown below) due to failing to do a clk_prepare()
> call before enabling a clock. It also fails to check the balance of
> prepare/unprepare as __pm_clk_remove() do clk_disable_unprepare() call.
> 
> This bug has probably been in since commit b2476490e ("clk: introduce
> the common clock framework") as the warning was part of the original
> commit. It is strange that it has not been noticed (although this has
> also been coupled with a failure for certain SH builds to not build the
> necessary glue to use this method of controlling the clocks).
>
> In summary, this is probably needed in several stable branches but need
> advice on which ones.
> 
> On the Renesas Lager board, this causes numerous warnings of the following
> and even worse the clock system will not enable clocks, causing drivers
> that are in development to fail to work:
> 
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at drivers/clk/clk.c:883 __clk_enable+0x2c/0xa0()

I've never noticed this on Lager, probably because Lager multiplatform doesn't 
make use of clock_ops.c as drivers/sh/pm_runtime.c (which you addressed in 
another patch that I've also replied to). I'm thus not sure we need to apply 
this as a fix and backport it to stable branches.

> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <r...@rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: Pavel Machek <pa...@ucw.cz>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.do...@codethink.co.uk>
> Reviewed-by: Ian Molton <ian.mol...@codethink.co.uk>
> ---
>  drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c b/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
> index 9d8fde7..b9dd8fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ static void pm_clk_acquire(struct device *dev, struct
> pm_clock_entry *ce) if (IS_ERR(ce->clk)) {
>               ce->status = PCE_STATUS_ERROR;
>       } else {
> +             clk_prepare(ce->clk);
>               ce->status = PCE_STATUS_ACQUIRED;
>               dev_dbg(dev, "Clock %s managed by runtime PM.\n", ce->con_id);
>       }
> @@ -99,10 +100,12 @@ static void __pm_clk_remove(struct pm_clock_entry *ce)
> 
>       if (ce->status < PCE_STATUS_ERROR) {
>               if (ce->status == PCE_STATUS_ENABLED)
> -                     clk_disable_unprepare(ce->clk);
> +                     clk_disable(ce->clk);
> 
> -             if (ce->status >= PCE_STATUS_ACQUIRED)
> +             if (ce->status >= PCE_STATUS_ACQUIRED) {
> +                     clk_unprepare(ce->clk);
>                       clk_put(ce->clk);
> +             }
>       }
> 
>       kfree(ce->con_id);
-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to