>
> This thing looks like a partial duplication of functionality which we
> already have - inat.*/insn.*, etc.
>
> It would be cleaner to integrate the mpx pieces into the existing x86
> insn analysis code and use it instead of growing your own, IMHO.
>
I saw a previous version of the code that did that, and it really didn't
work out well -- it ended up being more complex and slower.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
