On 01/10, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 04:34:59PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > doesn't this look much simpler than adding the "bool unshared" argument > > and changing the callers? > > I might be being too paranoid, but my concern with using rcu_lock_acquire() > and rcu_lock_release()
And I agree, I no longer suggest to use rcu_lock_acquire/release. It seems that you misunderstood me, let me send v2 for review. Oleg. fs/file.c | 30 +++++++++++------------------- include/linux/fdtable.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------- include/linux/rcupdate.h | 2 -- kernel/rcu/update.c | 11 ----------- 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/