On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 07:32:07PM +0000, Russell King wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 11:48:53AM +0000, Russell King wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 08:03:15PM +0000, Russell King wrote: > > > I think I may be seeing something odd here, maybe a possible memory leak. > > > The only problem I have is wondering whether I'm actually comparing like > > > with like. Maybe some networking people can provide a hint? > > > > > > Below is gathered from 2.6.11-rc1. > > > > > > bash-2.05a# cat /proc/net/rt_cache | wc -l; grep ip_dst /proc/slabinfo > > > 24 > > > ip_dst_cache 669 885 256 15 1 > > > > > > I'm fairly positive when I rebooted the machine a couple of days ago, > > > ip_dst_cache was significantly smaller for the same number of lines in > > > /proc/net/rt_cache. > > > > FYI, today it looks like this: > > > > bash-2.05a# cat /proc/net/rt_cache | wc -l; grep ip_dst /proc/slabinfo > > 26 > > ip_dst_cache 820 1065 256 15 1 > > > > So the dst cache seems to have grown by 151 in 16 hours... I'll continue > > monitoring and providing updates. > > Tonights update: > 50 > ip_dst_cache 1024 1245 256 15 1 > > As you can see, the dst cache is consistently growing by about 200 > entries per day. Given this, I predict that the box will fall over > due to "dst cache overflow" in roughly 35 days.
This mornings magic numbers are: 3 ip_dst_cache 1292 1485 256 15 1 Is no one interested in the fact that the DST cache is leaking and eventually takes out machines? I've had virtually zero interest in this problem so far. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/ 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
