On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 10:37:45AM -0800, Phil Oester wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 04:49:18PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > so obviously the GC does appear to be working - as can be seen from the
> > number of entries in /proc/net/rt_cache.  However, the number of objects
> > in the slab cache does grow day on day.  About 4 days ago, it was only
> > about 600 active objects.  Now it's more than twice that, and it'll
> > continue increasing until it hits 8192, where upon it's game over.
> 
> I can confirm the behavior you are seeing -- does seem to be a leak
> somewhere.  Below from a heavily used gateway with 26 days uptime:
> 
> # wc -l /proc/net/rt_cache ; grep ip_dst /proc/slabinfo
>   12870 /proc/net/rt_cache
> ip_dst_cache       53327  57855
> 
> Eventually I get the dst_cache overflow errors and have to reboot.

Can you provide some details, eg kernel configuration, loaded modules
and a brief overview of any netfilter modules you may be using.

Maybe we can work out what's common between our setups.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 PCMCIA      - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
                 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to