On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 09:08 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> I'm on board with the idea of embedding comm/pid/whatever,
I still think the space reduction isn't worth the
complication.
> but I
> either missed or do not understand why a second format-start character
> is being added. I think this will complicate audits and maybe trigger
> weird info leaks (imagine printing a string that was %-escaped, but
> not 0x1A-escaped?)
> Why not use % followed by 0x1A to be the start code, instead of just 0x1A?
gcc would bleat an error for
"unknown conversion type character 0x1a in format".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
