On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 11:31:38AM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > This code was first developped on the generic simple card, but its > recent DT extension cannot be easily extended again to support compound > cards as the one in the Cubox.
It would have been useful to have provided that feedback at the time rather than waiting until after it had been merged - it was in review for long enough. It would also be good to articulate the issues with the binding rather than simply stating they exist, and to consider adding a second binding to the existing generic card rather than adding a totally new card. Please also remember that all DT patches need to be reviewed by the DT people, you've not CCed either them or the list. > + - front-end or back-end: present if the DAI link describes resp. > + a front-end CPU DAI or a back-end CODEC DAI These are Linux-internal concepts which shouldn't appear in a DT binding or at the very least need definition. One thing to consider here is that these things are all about the internals of a SoC and you'd therefore expect that they would be defined separately from the card so as to avoid having to replicate information in every card using a given SoC.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
