>>> On 10.12.13 at 06:09, John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org> wrote:
> static cycle_t logarithmic_accumulation(struct timekeeper *tk, cycle_t
> offset,
> - u32 shift)
> + u32 shift, int *action)
With plain int used here, ...
> @@ -1369,7 +1369,7 @@ static void update_wall_time(void)
> struct timekeeper *tk = &shadow_timekeeper;
> cycle_t offset;
> int shift = 0, maxshift;
> - unsigned int action;
> + unsigned int action = 0;
... and unsigned int used here, ...
> @@ -1404,7 +1404,7 @@ static void update_wall_time(void)
> maxshift = (64 - (ilog2(ntp_tick_length())+1)) - 1;
> shift = min(shift, maxshift);
> while (offset >= tk->cycle_interval) {
> - offset = logarithmic_accumulation(tk, offset, shift);
> + offset = logarithmic_accumulation(tk, offset, shift, &action);
... does this compile without warning for you?
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
