Hi Jiri, On 9 December 2013 18:17, Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 11:17:41AM +0100, Jean Pihet wrote: >> Use the per-feature check flags for the unwinding feature in order >> to correctly compile the libunwind and libunwind-debug-frame feature >> checks. >> >> Tested on x86_64, ARMv7 and ARMv8 with and without LIBUNWIND_DIR set >> in 'make -C tools/perf' >> >> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <jean.pi...@linaro.org> >> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com> > > SNIP > >> +BUILD = $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $(OUTPUT)$@ $@.c $(LDFLAGS) >> >> ############################### >> >> test-all: >> - $(BUILD) -Werror -fstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -O2 -Werror >> -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -ldw -lelf -lnuma $(LIBUNWIND_LIBS) -lelf -laudit >> -I/usr/include/slang -lslang $(shell pkg-config --libs --cflags gtk+-2.0 >> 2>/dev/null) $(FLAGS_PERL_EMBED) $(FLAGS_PYTHON_EMBED) -DPACKAGE='"perf"' >> -lbfd -ldl >> + $(BUILD) -Werror -fstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -O2 -Werror >> -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -ldw -lelf -lnuma -lelf -laudit -I/usr/include/slang >> -lslang $(shell pkg-config --libs --cflags gtk+-2.0 2>/dev/null) >> $(FLAGS_PERL_EMBED) $(FLAGS_PYTHON_EMBED) -DPACKAGE='"perf"' -lbfd -ldl > > hum, the test-all build command should have every possible flags we use, > right? > including LIBUNWIND_CFLAGS, LIBUNWIND_LDFLAGS Oh yes you are right. I am overlooked the test-all feature (which never builds on my modest embedded systems). $(LIBUNWIND_LIBS) should be replaced by $(LIBUNWIND_CFLAGS) $(LIBUNWIND_LDFLAGS), is that a reasonable approach?
> > also, this patch no longer applies on acme's perf/core I am using a recent mainline (3.12-rc2). Let me correct the patch on acme's perf/core. Is that OK? Thx for reviewing! Jean > > jirka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
