From: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
uprobe_trace_print() and uprobe_perf_print() need to pass the additional
info to call_fetch() methods, currently there is no simple way to do this.
current->utask looks like a natural place to hold this info, but we need
to allocate it before handler_chain().
This is a bit unfortunate, perhaps we will find a better solution later,
but this is simnple and should work right now.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <sri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org>
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 24b7d6ca871b..3cc8e0bb8acf 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1828,6 +1828,10 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *regs)
if (unlikely(!test_bit(UPROBE_COPY_INSN, &uprobe->flags)))
goto out;
+ /* Tracing handlers use ->utask to communicate with fetch methods */
+ if (!get_utask())
+ goto out;
+
handler_chain(uprobe, regs);
if (can_skip_sstep(uprobe, regs))
goto out;
--
1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
