On 03/12/13 20:23, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 09:23:04AM +0200, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
>> perf_event__preprocess_sample() is called in
>> process_sample_event().  Instead of calling it
>> again in perf_evsel__print_ip(), pass though
>> the resultant addr_location.
> 
> <SNIP>
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c
>> @@ -1487,11 +1487,12 @@ struct perf_evsel 
>> *perf_session__find_first_evtype(struct perf_session *session,
>>      return NULL;
>>  }
>>  
>> -void perf_evsel__print_ip(struct perf_evsel *evsel, union perf_event *event,
>> +void perf_evsel__print_ip(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
>> +                      union perf_event *event __maybe_unused,
> 
> Why do we have to keep this parameter?

You are right - it is not needed.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to