On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Before this patch, I was testing this one >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/13/336 > > perhaps this patch makes more sense for stable.
I guess we should consider it. > But, to clarify just in case, it is not needed after this series. > >> which is fixing my oom issues. > > Yes, but it doesn't fix all problems even in mm/oom_kill.c, and > we need to fix while_each_thread() anyway. > >> I applied the two patches on top of a 3.10.x and got some tasks >> stalled after the first OOM: > > So you are saying that this was introduced by this series? yes, without thse two patches I can't reproduce my issue. > Could you retest with the recent kernel? I'll see if I find time for it; will keep you up to date. Thanks, -- William -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
