From: Michal Nazarewicz <min...@mina86.com>

[commit 8185554d: fix incorrect inode acl reset] introduced a dead
code by adding a condition which can never be true to an else
branch.  The condition can never be true because it is already
checked by a previous if statement which causes function to return.

Signed-off-by: Michal Nazarewicz <min...@mina86.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/acl.c | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/acl.c b/fs/btrfs/acl.c
index 0890c83..460f36b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/acl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/acl.c
@@ -225,13 +225,8 @@ int btrfs_init_acl(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
                ret = posix_acl_create(&acl, GFP_NOFS, &inode->i_mode);
                if (ret < 0)
                        return ret;
-
-               if (ret > 0) {
-                       /* we need an acl */
+               if (ret > 0) /* we need an acl */
                        ret = btrfs_set_acl(trans, inode, acl, ACL_TYPE_ACCESS);
-               } else if (ret < 0) {
-                       cache_no_acl(inode);
-               }
        } else {
                cache_no_acl(inode);
        }
-- 
1.8.4.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to