On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 16:24 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> From: Mark Brown <broo...@linaro.org>
>
> Eliminate the gap between DT becoming available and this being used to say
> we have full constraints by checking directly for DT every time we check
> for full constraints. This improves interoperaton with optional regulator
> support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broo...@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> index 02fdf925bb56..d85f31385b24 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static const char *rdev_get_name(struct regulator_dev
> *rdev)
>
> static bool have_full_constraints(void)
> {
> - return has_full_constraints;
> + return has_full_constraints || of_have_populated_dt();
> }
>
> /**
Doesn't this now make this code in regulator_init_complete()
redundant..?
if (of_have_populated_dt())
has_full_constraints = true;
Or is keeping this to avoid one less variable check a worthwhile
optimisation?
--
Tixy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
