From: Mark Brown <broo...@linaro.org>
Simple code reorganisation so we can change the logic for deciding what
full constraints are more easily.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broo...@linaro.org>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 3fe13130baec..02fdf925bb56 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -119,6 +119,11 @@ static const char *rdev_get_name(struct regulator_dev
*rdev)
return "";
}
+static bool have_full_constraints(void)
+{
+ return has_full_constraints;
+}
+
/**
* of_get_regulator - get a regulator device node based on supply name
* @dev: Device pointer for the consumer (of regulator) device
@@ -1340,7 +1345,7 @@ static struct regulator *_regulator_get(struct device
*dev, const char *id,
* Assume that a regulator is physically present and enabled
* even if it isn't hooked up and just provide a dummy.
*/
- if (has_full_constraints && allow_dummy) {
+ if (have_full_constraints() && allow_dummy) {
pr_warn("%s supply %s not found, using dummy regulator\n",
devname, id);
@@ -3627,7 +3632,7 @@ int regulator_suspend_finish(void)
if (error)
ret = error;
} else {
- if (!has_full_constraints)
+ if (!have_full_constraints())
goto unlock;
if (!ops->disable)
goto unlock;
@@ -3825,7 +3830,7 @@ static int __init regulator_init_complete(void)
if (!enabled)
goto unlock;
- if (has_full_constraints) {
+ if (have_full_constraints()) {
/* We log since this may kill the system if it
* goes wrong. */
rdev_info(rdev, "disabling\n");
--
1.8.4.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
