On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 02:56:14PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > I think it's a good idea for people using the m25p80, but still > > doesn't effect us. All of our chips are dynamically probable. We are > > This doesn't seem realistic, you're assuming that system integrators > won't go and use chips you've not heard of and at least in the case of > things like quad read my understanding is that the commands aren't > standardised so the host just has to know what to write.
I'm not following? What are you suggesting? After some analysis we have come to the conclusion that using m25p80 is not feasible. It makes more sense for this to be an orthogonal/stand-alone driver. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
