On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Theodore Ts'o <ty...@mit.edu> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 02:52:16PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> > That's exactly what I did. Addressing feedback constructively doesn't >> > mean do exactly what you say without arguing. >> >> Your reply to my routine feedback was obtuse, argumentative and needlessly >> confrontative - that's not 'constructive'. > > Felipe, remember when on the Git list Junio said he would stop trying > to respond to any patches that had problems because you couldn't > respond constructively to feedback, and you claimed that you had no > problems working with other folks, including on the Linux Kernel > mailing list?
Ingo Molnar != kernel folks, and I don't see any hints of kernel folks suggesting to drop patch #1 because of non-technical issues. If the patch is technically correct, conforms to standard practices, and solves a problem; it gets applied. Isn't that how it works in Linux? -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
